Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Chapter 6.....

When I first started reading Chapter 6, I thought that it was going to expand on the subject matter of what makes a good parent. Little did I know the whole chapter was going to be about the importance of naming children. The authors first give an example of this by talking about a father who named one child Loser and one child Winner. Of course Loser turned out to be a winner in life and Winner ended up as a loser. Who truly in their right mind would ever do something like that? Even if you take away the embarrassment of growing up with the name Loser, it would be hard for Loser to get over the fact that his Dad truly thought he would be a loser. I feel the main reason Loser became a winner was because he was motivated to prove to his Dad that he would not be a loser. The book then starts talking about how Blacks come up with uncommon names on a consistent basis while White names are more common. I have always thought to myself that Blacks have such cooler names than Whites. The names are so much more creative and interesting. I never really thought about the repercussions of these unique names. The authors explain how this could affect Blacks because people make assumptions just based on other people’s names. They explained a study that was done where there were two resumes sent in with the same qualifications but one was under a “white” name and one was under a “black” name. It turned out that there were much more responses for the White person than the Black person. I personally think this is just society being ignorant. I mean how could you possibly judge someone by their name? I understand that based on statistics if someone’s name is something very uncommon the chance of them coming from a low income family is high, but there are many people with uncommon names that come from high income families too. No one controls what their name is, and for someone to judge them on what their parents decided to name them is a joke. The authors then explain the most common names regarding low income people and high income. They figure out that the most common names from high income people eventually trickle down and in ten to twenty years these are the most common names for low income people. This seems like a very interesting finding because I would of never recognized this on my own. This chapter concludes with the authors explaining that the name of person won’t affect their personality, but it probably is an indication of the parent’s prediction on how successful their child will be.

4 comments:

John Reilly said...

Is it just me or are these authors actaully racist? They automatically equate low-income with being African-American. When they give examples of under privliged people its always a black child who is beaten or something. They wrote about the poor African-Americans that hate it when their peers try to get out of poverty. This is acting "white"?
I really don't think the authors are racist. As i written in several other places, they were just trying to sell books by shocking people.

sheilaM said...

I agree about the shock appeal. But there are alot of Black White tensions that exist that no one wants to talk about and the authors do bring this to light. The example in the book that gets my attention is when the mother names her child shithead. Although not pronounced shithead it is spelt that way.I know me, even being hispanic, wouldn't want anyone named that in my office. Call me crazy, but it is very hard to be taken seriously professionally witha that name. The perception of you woudl be rough. Even growing up with children can be cruel. I hate to sound rude or close minded, but I wdon't care about names usually. I don't feel if our parenst decided to get creative on teh spelling or even the name you should be discriminated against. I do feel parents need to be fair to their children and realize that their name is read aloud in classrooms and that it can ffect their children's professional life and social life as well.

Jared said...

Troy as sad as it is I have to believe that it is true what the authors say about employers and name discrimination. I just can't se many employers choosing obscure name with a more conservative normal name. Its just human nature whether the employer to be racist or not to judge based on name in some situations.

Anonymous said...

I agree that you should not judge someone by their name especially when a child has no control over their name. I feel that Loser was a mean name for a parent to name their child. However, I think that Loser had a personal drive within him to get over his name. A name is just a name. Sure, it is how someone will address you for the rest of your life. However, that which exist inside of you, your personal drive, will make others believe you to be successful reguardless of your name. It is unfortunate that employers somehow discriminate employees by the "blackness" or "whiteness" of their name on a resume.